FLOOR SESSION AGENDA - Regular Session:Check-in Session - 9:00 a.m.
Agendas
ASSEMBLY BILLS—SECOND READING FILE
GOVERNOR’S VETOES
To the Members of the California State Senate:
I am returning Senate Bill 301 without my signature.
This bill would require the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to establish the Zero-Emission Aftermarket Conversion Project (ZACP) to provide an applicant with a financial rebate for converting a gasoline- or diesel-fueled vehicle into a zero-emission vehicle (ZEV).
California is showing the world what's possible - fostering innovation and creating space for an industry to flourish as the sale of ZEVs reach record highs, with over 1.8 million ZEVs now on California's roads. The state continues to invest billions of dollars in ZEV deployment and supporting infrastructure to achieve our ambitious climate and clean air goals.
While I share the author's desire to further accelerate the state's transition to ZEVs, this bill creates a new program at a time when the state faces a $44.9 billion shortfall for the 2024-25 fiscal year. Additionally, there is no funding currently identified or available in the state budget to support this new program.
For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill.
Sincerely,
Gavin Newsom
2024Jun. 14Shall Senate Bill 301 become a law notwithstanding the objections of the Governor? (Must be considered pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.)
GOVERNOR’S APPOINTMENTS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS –
SB 382, as it passed the Senate, required, on or after January 1, 2026, a seller of a single-family residential property to deliver a specified disclosure statement to the prospective buyer regarding the electrical systems of the property.
The Assembly amendments add an exception to that requirement, and additionally require a seller of a single-family residential property to disclose, in writing, the existence of any state or local requirements relating to the future replacement of existing gas-powered appliances that are being transferred with the property, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Jun. 20In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.50S.B.No. 674 —Gonzalez et al.An act relating to air pollution.Digest of Assembly Amendments Pending(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—31.NOES—6.)2024Jul. 1In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.51S.B.No. 675 —Limón et al.An act relating to fire prevention.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 675, as it passed the Senate, required the Range Management Advisory Committee, in consultation with the Department of Fish and Wildlife and the University of California Cooperative Extension Livestock and Natural Resources Advisors and Specialists, to develop guidance for local or regional prescribed grazing plans. SB 675, as it passed the Senate, required the guidance to include specified things, including best practices for identifying and selecting priority areas for prescribed grazing.
The Assembly amendments additionally require the committee to consult with fire ecologists with expertise in the full range of California’s vegetation communities when developing the guidance. The Assembly amendments require the guidance to include best practices for use of prescribed grazing for reducing wildfire risk in and near fire-threatened communities, as provided. The Assembly amendments also make nonsubstantive changes.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Jul. 1In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.52S.B.No. 1106 —Rubio.An act relating to conservatorship.Digest of Assembly Amendments Pending(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Jul. 1In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.53S.B.No. 1146 —Wilk.An act relating to mortgages.Digest of Assembly Amendments Pending(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Jul. 1In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.SENATE BILLS—THIRD READING FILE
ASSEMBLY BILLS—THIRD READING FILE
CONSENT CALENDAR-SECOND LEGISLATIVE DAY
SPECIAL CONSENT CALENDAR #42
SB 1353, as it passed the Senate, added to the Youth Bill of Rights, which is established for all youth confined in a juvenile facility, the right to not be deprived of mental health resources, including daily access to counselors, therapists, mentors, or any related services necessary for mental well-being, rehabilitation, and the promotion of positive youth development while detained in a juvenile facility.
The Assembly amendments instead specify that the Youth Bill of Rights includes the right to receive adequate, appropriate, and timely behavioral health services provided by qualified professionals and consistent with current professional standards of care.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—32.NOES—0.)2024Jun. 25In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.202S.B.No. 949 —Blakespear et al.An act relating to courts.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 949, as it passed the Senate, required, beginning July 1, 2026, the superior court to provide any court user with a reasonable amount of break time during a court proceeding to express breast milk each time the court user has a need to do so. SB 949, as it passed the Senate, also made a technical clarification to an authorization that, commencing July 1, 2026, permits a superior court to comply with a requirement to provide court users with access to a lactation room in a courthouse in which a lactation room is also provided to court employees, as specified.
The Assembly amendments, instead, require the superior court to provide any court user who is participating in an ongoing court proceeding with a reasonable amount of break time during a court proceeding to express breast milk. The Assembly amendments delete the technical clarification of the lactation room exemption for court users. The Assembly amendments also specify that the bill’s provisions do not affect any requirements imposed by law upon a superior court as an employer in relation to its employees.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—36.NOES—0.)2024Jun. 27In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.203S.B.No. 1024 —Ochoa Bogh.An act relating to healing arts.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1024, as it passed the Senate, among other things, required a licensee under the Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist Act (LMFTA), the Educational Psychologist Practice Act, the Clinical Social Worker Practice Act (CSWPA), and the Licensed Professional Clinical Counselor Act (LPCCA), to display their license in a conspicuous place in their primary place of practice when seeing clients in person. SB 1024, as it passed the Senate, and with respect to the LMFTA, CSWPA, and LPCCA, prohibited a supervisor in nonexempt settings from serving as individual or triadic supervisors for more than a total of 6 persons who are receiving supervision for providing clinical mental health services.
The Assembly amendments, instead, require a licensee to display their license in a conspicuous place in their primary place of practice when rendering professional clinical services in person, and prohibit the above-specified supervisors from serving as individual or triadic supervisors for more than a total of 6 persons who are not fully licensed at the highest level for independent clinical practice and who are receiving supervision for providing clinical mental health services.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Jun. 27In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.204S.B.No. 1034 —Seyarto et al.An act relating to public records.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1034, as it passed the Senate, revised the unusual circumstances, pursuant to the California Public Records Act, under which the time limit for a state or local agency to determine whether a public records request seeks copies of disclosable public records in the possession of the agency may be extended, to include the need to search for, collect, appropriately examine, and copy records during a state of emergency, as defined, proclaimed by the Governor, when the state of emergency has affected the agency’s ability to timely respond to requests due to decreased staffing or closure of the agency’s facilities, except as specified.
The Assembly amendments, instead, revise the unusual circumstances described above to include the need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine records during a state of emergency, as defined, proclaimed by the Governor, in the jurisdiction where the agency is located, when the state of emergency currently affects, due to the state of emergency, the agency’s ability to timely respond to requests due to staffing shortages or closure of facilities where the requested records are located, except as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—36.NOES—0.)2024Jun. 27In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.205S.B.No. 1190 —Laird.An act relating to mobilehomes.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1190, as it passed the Senate, made any entity that willfully violates the provisions of the bill which, among other things, make any covenant, restriction, or condition contained in any rental agreement or other instrument affecting the tenancy of a homeowner or resident in a mobilehome park, or in a subdivision, cooperative, or condominium for mobilehomes, or in a resident-owned mobilehome park that effectively prohibits or restricts the installation or use of a solar energy system, as defined, on the mobilehome or the site, lot, or space on which the mobilehome is located void and unenforceable, liable to the homeowner, resident, or other party for actual damages occasioned thereby, and for a civil penalty paid to the homeowner, resident, or other party in an amount not to exceed $1,000.
The Assembly amendments would limit the above-described liability to a subdivision, cooperative, or condominium for mobilehomes, or a resident-owned mobilehome park, and would increase the amount of the civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $2,000.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Jun. 27In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.206S.B.No. 1385 —Roth et al.An act relating to Medi-Cal.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1385, as it passed the Senate, required a Medi-Cal managed care plan to adopt policies and procedures to effectuate a billing pathway for supervising providers, as defined, to claim for the provision of community health worker services to enrollees during an emergency department visit and an outpatient followup to an emergency department visit, as specified, and required the State Department of Health Care Services to develop similar guidance for use in the fee-for-service delivery system.
The Assembly amendments impose a deadline of July 1, 2025, for the adoption of those policies and procedures and the development of the guidance. The Assembly amendments make changes to the definition of “supervising provider” and various technical changes.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Jun. 27In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.207A.C.R.No. 192 —Jones-Sawyer et al.Relative to Juneteenth.Vote required: 212024Jun. 17Coauthors revised. Adopted and to Senate.Jun. 18In Senate. To Com. on RLS.Jun. 26From committee: Ordered to third reading.208A.C.R.No. 196 —Ta et al.Relative to lung cancer awareness.Vote required: 212024Jun. 13Coauthors revised. Adopted and to Senate.Jun. 17In Senate. To Com. on RLS.Jun. 26From committee: Ordered to third reading.209A.C.R.No. 202 —McCarty et al.Relative to Loving Day.Vote required: 212024Jun. 17Coauthors revised. Adopted and to Senate.Jun. 18In Senate. To Com. on RLS.Jun. 26From committee: Ordered to third reading.210A.C.R.No. 207 —Aguiar-Curry et al.Relative to Sacramento Valley Ecosystem Awareness Week.Vote required: 212024Jun. 13Coauthors revised. Adopted and to Senate.Jun. 17In Senate. To Com. on RLS.Jun. 26From committee: Ordered to third reading.211A.C.R.No. 208 —Papan et al.Relative to California State Parks Week.Vote required: 212024Jun. 13Coauthors revised. Adopted and to Senate.Jun. 17In Senate. To Com. on RLS.Jun. 26From committee: Ordered to third reading.