FLOOR SESSION AGENDA - Regular Session: 10:00 a.m.
Agendas
ASSEMBLY BILLS—SECOND READING FILE
GOVERNOR’S VETOES
To the Members of the California State Senate:
I am returning Senate Bill 301 without my signature.
This bill would require the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to establish the Zero-Emission Aftermarket Conversion Project (ZACP) to provide an applicant with a financial rebate for converting a gasoline- or diesel-fueled vehicle into a zero-emission vehicle (ZEV).
California is showing the world what's possible - fostering innovation and creating space for an industry to flourish as the sale of ZEVs reach record highs, with over 1.8 million ZEVs now on California's roads. The state continues to invest billions of dollars in ZEV deployment and supporting infrastructure to achieve our ambitious climate and clean air goals.
While I share the author's desire to further accelerate the state's transition to ZEVs, this bill creates a new program at a time when the state faces a $44.9 billion shortfall for the 2024-25 fiscal year. Additionally, there is no funding currently identified or available in the state budget to support this new program.
For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill.
Sincerely,
Gavin Newsom
2024Jun. 14Shall Senate Bill 301 become a law notwithstanding the objections of the Governor? (Must be considered pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.)
10S.B.No. 674 —Gonzalez et al.An act relating to air pollution.Vote required: 27To the Members of the California State Senate:
I am returning Senate Bill 674 without my signature.
This bill would make several changes to the refinery fence-line air monitoring program, including expanding the program to include monitoring for biofuel refineries and additional pollutants, applying the program to contiguous or adjacent refinery-related facilities, increasing the standards for data quality, and providing new processes for notifying local communities.
California has some of the most stringent refinery air monitoring and pollution standards in the world. These standards have been developed and implemented by the state's local air quality management districts, and each of these districts possess the authority and technical expertise to update, expand and modify these standards according to the best available science.
While I share the author's desire to protect communities from air pollution, local air quality management districts are already carrying out the necessary action to do just that. Additionally, because this bill mandates these districts to implement highly prescriptive measures, it might be found to require state reimbursement of implementation costs at a time when we just recently closed a $44.9 billion shortfall for the 2024-25 fiscal year. There is no state funding identified or available in the state budget to support these efforts.
For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill.
Sincerely,
Gavin Newsom
2024Aug. 19Shall Senate Bill 674 become a law notwithstanding the objections of the Governor? (Must be considered pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.)UNFINISHED BUSINESS –
SB 577, as it passed the Senate, authorized the State Fire Marshal to establish and collect admission fees and other fees associated with the California Fire Service Training and Education Program, and to establish fees to implement the California Fire and Arson Training Act, as specified.
The Assembly amendments delete the contents of SB 577 and, instead, clarify that specified training provisions apply to life agents selling individual life insurance policies, and authorize service of legal process, notices, and other papers to be made in specified circumstances to the Insurance Commissioner, their deputy, or their designated agent, accompanied by a substituted service fee.
The Assembly amendments authorize the commissioner to proceed with a civil action for violation of a prohibition against employing runners and other persons to procure clients, services, or benefits under workers’ compensation coverage or a contract of insurance if the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter, eliminate a requirement for the district attorney or the commissioner to give reasons for consenting to dismissal of such an action, and clarify that a civil complaint for a violation of this prohibition is required to remain under seal for at least 60 days from the date of service on the district attorney and commissioner.
The Assembly amendments require certain first responder benefit and relief associations to renew their certificate of authority within 30 days after a change in name or address or before a merger.
The Assembly amendments exempt an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the commissioner from specified procedures for a special motion to strike in a civil cause of action arising from an act in furtherance of a person’s right of petition or free speech and for offers to compromise before commencement of a civil trial or arbitration.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 15In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.12S.B.No. 1137 —Smallwood-Cuevas et al.An act relating to discrimination.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1137, as it passed the Senate, revised a definition within the Unruh Civil Rights Act of “sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status” to include any intersection or combination of those characteristics. SB 1137, as it passed the Senate, also revised a definition within educational equity provisions of “disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic that is contained in the definition of hate crimes” to include any intersection or combination of those characteristics. SB 1137, as it passed the Senate, additionally revised a definition within the California Fair Employment and Housing Act on “race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status” to include any intersection or combination of those characteristics.
The Assembly amendments delete references to “intersection” within the above provisions. The Assembly amendments incorporate additional changes to Section 51 of the Civil Code proposed by AB 1815 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1815 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The Assembly amendments also incorporate additional changes to Section 12926 of the Government Code proposed by AB 1815 and SB 1022 to be operative only if this bill and either or both of those bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The Assembly amendments also add an additional coauthor.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—31.NOES—6.)2024Aug. 20In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.13S.B.No. 901 —Umberg.An act relating to the military.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 901, as it passed the Senate, made a person ineligible to commission or enlist in the California National Guard or State Guard if the person actively participated to advocate for, or engaged in, the use of unlawful force, unlawful violence, or other illegal means to deprive an individual of their rights, as specified, and required an officer or enlisted person to be discharged from the California National Guard under undesirable conditions if the person actively participated in this conduct.
The Assembly amendments expanded the conduct that would make a person ineligible to commission or enlist in the California National Guard or State Guard, including, among others, advocating for, engaging in, or supporting an act of rebellion or insurrection, and the amendments instead require an officer or enlisted person who actively participates in this conduct to receive an other than honorable discharge from the California National Guard.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 22In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.14S.B.No. 268 —Alvarado-Gil et al.An act relating to crimes.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 268, as it passed the Senate, included the crime of rape of an intoxicated person wherein the defendant drugged the victim, as a “violent felony” for the purposes of provisions related to sentencing enhancements for prior convictions and other provisions of the Penal Code.
The Assembly amendments add coauthors and make a technical, nonsubstantive change.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: no.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.15S.B.No. 310 —Dodd.An act relating to fire prevention.Digest of Assembly Amendments Pending(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.16S.B.No. 312 —Wiener et al.An act relating to environmental quality.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 312, as it passed the Senate, required a public university to obtain Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Platinum certification for each building within a university housing development project that is exempted from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) no later than 12 months from the issuance of the building’s certificate of occupancy or its usage. SB 312, as it passed the Senate, prohibited a public university that has exempted a university housing development project from being eligible to exempt a subsequent university housing development project until the public university has obtained LEED Platinum certification for each building within the prior exempted university housing development project.
The Assembly amendments extend the above-described university housing development project CEQA exemption by 2 years, until January 1, 2032. The Assembly amendments require a public university to obtain LEED Platinum certification for each building within a university housing development project no later than 18 months from the issuance of the building’s certificate of occupancy or an equivalent certification, or its initial usage, and authorize a public university to obtain 2 extensions for this LEED certification compliance requirement in 6-month increments, as provided. The Assembly amendments prohibit a public university that has exempted an approved university housing development project from applying that exemption to a subsequent university housing development project until the public university has obtained LEED Platinum certification for each building within the prior exempted university housing development project, except as specified. The Assembly amendments require a university housing development project carried out by the University of California, in order to be exempt from CEQA under the exemption, to be located on a campus site identified for housing, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—34.NOES—1.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.17S.B.No. 366 —Caballero et al.An act relating to water.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 366, as it passed the Senate, required the Department of Water Resources to, in consultation with the California Water Commission, establish a stakeholder advisory committee, as provided, and develop a plan for addressing the state’s water needs and meeting certain long-term water supply targets to be known as “The California Water Plan” in consultation with the commission and a stakeholder advisory committee, among other entities. SB 366, as it passed the Senate, required the department to establish a long-term water supply target for 2050 as part of the 2028 update to the plan.
The Assembly amendments instead require the department, in consultation with the commission, to expand membership of the existing advisory committee to representatives of certain interests, develop a comprehensive, strategic plan for the sustainable management and stewardship of California’s water resources in consultation with the advisory committee, and update a specified planning target for 2050 as part of the 2033 update to the plan. The Assembly amendments require the department to offer the regional water quality control boards opportunities to provide input to assist the department in updating the plan and authorizes the department to add certain members to the advisory committee. The Assembly amendments also require each update to the plan to include various components, including a discussion of urban sector water needs and a discussion of agricultural water needs.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.18S.B.No. 445 —Portantino et al.An act relating to special education.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 445, as it passed the Senate, among other things, (1) required a local educational agency to, upon request by a pupil’s parent, translate into the native language of the parent, or into another mode of communication used by the parent, the pupil’s completed individualized education program (IEP), any revisions to the IEP, and certain documents discussed at an IEP team meeting, (2) required for a parent whose native language is one of the 8 most commonly spoken languages, as provided, excluding English, in a local educational agency, that the completed IEP and any revisions to the IEP be translated within 30 calendar days of that meeting or within 30 calendar days of a later request, (3) required these documents to be translated by a qualified translator, and (4) required the State Department of Education to revise its notice of procedural safeguards, in English and in the primary languages for which the department has developed translated versions, to inform parents of their right to request the translation of these documents.
The Assembly amendments delete the contents of SB 445 and instead require the department to, by January 1, 2027, or no later than 18 months after the final draft of the state standardized IEP template developed by the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is converted to a digital platform, whichever date comes first, translate the IEP template into the top 10 most commonly spoken languages used across the state other than English and, among other things, make those templates available on its internet website, as provided.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.19S.B.No. 758 —Umberg et al.An act relating to firearms.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 758, as it passed the Senate, among other things, made it a crime for a person to purchase or receive a firearm from a dealer, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the delivery of that firearm by that dealer to that person violates specified provisions regulating the delivery of a firearm by a dealer. The bill also required a change to the signage at Department of Food and Agriculture inspection stations.
The Assembly amendments remove both of these provisions.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—30.NOES—6.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.20S.B.No. 764 —Padilla et al.An act relating to minors.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 764, as it passed the Senate, required a vlogger, as defined, to compensate a minor under 18 years of age if the minor is engaged in the work of vlogging, as specified. SB 764, as it passed the Senate, defined related terms. SB 764, as it passed the Senate, defined a minor under 18 years of age as engaged in the work of vlogging if the minor met specified conditions in the previous 12-month period, including that the vlogger received actual compensation for image or video content of at least $15,000 in the prior 12-month period. SB 764, as it passed the Senate, required all vloggers whose content features a minor under 18 years of age engaged in the work of vlogging to maintain specified records and to provide the minor specified information each month. SB 764, as it passed the Senate, required the vlogger to compensate the minor, as specified.
The Assembly amendments revise the defined terminology and define a minor to be considered in the work of vlogging if the minor meets specified conditions at any time during a given month, including that the vlogger received actual compensation for image or video content of at least $1,250 in the month. The Assembly amendments require all vloggers whose content features a minor engaged in the work of vlogging to maintain, and make available to the minor upon request, specified records. The Assembly amendments revise the requirements for the amount deposited for the reporting period into the trust account for the benefit of the minor engaged in vlogging to be calculated by multiplying the percentage of total minutes the vlogger received compensation for during the reporting period in which the minor is included, as specified, by the total compensation generated from vlogs featuring the minor during the reporting period multiplied by .65. The Assembly amendments require each qualifying minor to have their own trust account and the vlogger to deposit funds into the account no less than once every 3 months. The Assembly amendments exempt from these provisions a contract for vlogging services between a minor and their parent or guardian if a court approves the contract, as specified, and require that the court, in determining whether to approve such a contract, consider whether the terms of the contract are at least as beneficial to the minor as the compensation the minor would otherwise receive under these provisions.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—34.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.21S.B.No. 782 —Limón et al.An act relating to state government.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 782, as it passed the Senate, required the office of the Governor to, commencing January 1, 2026, maintain on its internet website a list of state boards and commissions including a membership list. SB 782, as it passed the Senate, required the office to publish an annual report, commencing January 1, 2027, containing aggregate demographic information about appointees made by the Governor’s office in the previous year.
SB 782, as it passed the Senate, defined “demographic information” for these purposes to include voluntarily self-reported ethnicity, gender, disability status, region, party affiliation, and veteran status.
The Assembly amendments expand the definition of “demographic information” to also include voluntarily self-reported gender identity and sexual orientation.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.22S.B.No. 900 —Umberg.An act relating to common interest developments.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 900, as it passed the Senate, required an association managing a common interest development, with certain exceptions, to make repairs if the development had an interruption of specified utility services beginning in the common area, and required the association to begin the process to make repairs or replacements within 10 days.
The Assembly amendments specify that an association is responsible for the repairs and add an additional exception to the repair requirement, as specified. The Assembly amendments require the association’s board to begin the process to make repairs necessary to restore the interrupted utility service within 14 days of the interruption and create a process for reducing the requirements for a quorum in the event the association’s board is unable to establish a quorum within 14 days.
SB 900, as it passed the Senate, allowed for an association to obtain competitive financing to pay for the costs of repairs without requiring a vote of the members under certain circumstances, including if a vote does not take place to begin the process to make repairs within 10 days.
The Assembly amendments allow, if there are insufficient reserve funds to cover the cost of repairs, the association to obtain competitive financing from a financial institution to pay for the cost of repairs, as well as levy an emergency assessment to allow for repayment of the loan.
SB 900, as it passed the Senate, required that, before obtaining this financing, the board pass and distribute a resolution to the members with the notice of assessment and allowed association board members to vote electronically to initiate repairs.
The Assembly amendments require that the resolution be distributed along with notice of the emergency assessment and any other notices otherwise required by law or governing documents. The Assembly amendments require and clarify that voting may be conducted electronically notwithstanding other statutory requirements. The Assembly amendments further require all records of the vote to be considered association records and subject to specified inspection and retention requirements.
SB 900, as it passed the Senate, required that, if substantial repairs to a utility were needed, a representative from that utility service address the association in person with a description of the problem, suggested solutions, and expected timelines.
The Assembly amendments remove the requirement that a representative from a utility service present to the association in person. The Assembly amendments exempt associations from these requirements if they are located in an area impacted by a state of disaster or emergency, as specified, as long as that disaster or emergency materially affects the association’s ability to preform its responsibilities.
SB 900, as it passed the Senate, defines “major components” for the purposes of the association’s annual budget report to include gas lines.
The Assembly amendments expand the definition of “major components” to also include water and electrical service. The Assembly amendments additionally reference “replacements” together with “repairs” and clarify where the bill applies to the association director rather than board members.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.23S.B.No. 907 —Newman et al.An act relating to county boards of education.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 907, as it passed the Senate, required an election for the Orange County Board of Education to be consolidated with the statewide general election in November of each even-numbered year and notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, required the Orange County Board of Education to consist of 7 members.
The Assembly amendments additionally clarify that the above-described requirement for consolidation with the statewide general election begins in 2026 and that the above-described requirement for the Orange County Board of Education to consist of 7 members takes effect after the next redistricting process takes place in 2030 that accounts for 7 trustee areas.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—30.NOES—9.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.24S.B.No. 919 —Umberg.An act relating to franchises.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 919, as it passed the Senate, beginning July 1, 2025, required a third-party franchise seller, as defined, to register with the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation and provide specified information. SB 919, as it passed the Senate required a registered third-party franchise seller to promptly notify the commissioner of any material change, as defined and specified.
The Assembly amendments instead apply the provisions of SB 919 to franchise brokers, as defined. The amendments also change the information that must be provided to the commissioner. The amendments also remove the definition and specification of “material change” for purposes of the provisions above, and instead authorize the commissioner to further define what shall be considered a “material change,” as specified. The amendments also remove the operative date of the provisions of SB 919 from July 1, 2025, and instead provide that implementation of the bill’s provisions is contingent upon an appropriation, as specified, and make the provisions of SB 919 operative on the later of 2 specified dates.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—1.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.25S.B.No. 936 —Seyarto et al.An act relating to transportation.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 936, as it passed the Senate, required the Office of Planning and Research, in coordination with the Department of Transportation, to conduct a study to identify, among other things, certain locations in the state highway system with regard to vehicle collisions and crash exposure.
The Assembly amendments instead require the department to conduct the study and eliminate the requirement that the study identify those locations in the state highway system with regard to crash exposure.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—36.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.26S.B.No. 951 —Wiener.An act relating to coastal resources.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 951, as it passed the Senate, applied specified rezoning standards for any necessary local coastal program updates for jurisdictions located within the coastal zone.
The Assembly amendments instead delete this provision.
SB 951, as it passed the Senate, allowed a local government taking action on a coastal development permit to send notification of its final action to the California Coastal Commission by email.
The Assembly amendments instead allow that notification to the commission by electronic mail, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.27S.B.No. 960 —Wiener et al.An act relating to transportation.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 960, as it passed the Senate, required, beginning with the 2026 state highway operation and protection program (SHOPP), all transportation projects on state highways funded or overseen by the Department of Transportation to provide complete streets facilities, except as specified. SB 960, as it passed the Senate, also required each project development team established by the department for a project on a state highway funded or overseen by the department to conduct specified outreach. SB 960, as it passed the Senate, required the Director of Transportation to adopt a transit priority policy to guide the implementation of transit priority facilities on the state highway system, as specified.
The Assembly amendments require the department to commit to specific 4-year targets to incorporate certain complete streets facilities into projects funded by the SHOPP instead of requiring all transportation projects on state highways funded or overseen by the department to provide complete streets facilities. The Assembly amendments require outreach by the department, instead of each project development team, for projects funded by the SHOPP with complete streets facilities. The Assembly amendments also require the director to implement a transit policy, instead of a transit priority policy, to guide the implementation of transit priority facilities and transit stops on the state highway system, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—28.NOES—9.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.28S.B.No. 988 —Wiener.An act relating to independent contractors.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 988, as it passed the Senate, established the Freelance Worker Protection Act, which imposes various requirements relating to contracts between a hiring party and a freelance worker. SB 988, as it passed the Senate, authorized the Labor Commissioner, an aggrieved freelance worker, and a public prosecutor to bring a civil action to enforce the Freelance Worker Protection Act.
The Assembly amendments, among other things, remove the Labor Commissioner’s authorization, so that only an aggrieved freelance worker or a public prosecutor may bring a civil action to enforce the Freelance Worker Protection Act. The Assembly amendments also make various nonsubstantive changes.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—33.NOES—3.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.29S.B.No. 1061 —Limón et al.An act relating to consumer debt.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1061, as it passed the Senate, among other things, prohibited a consumer credit reporting agency or an investigative consumer reporting agency from making a consumer credit report or an investigative consumer report containing information about medical debt, and defines the term “medical debt” to mean a debt related to, in whole or in part, a transaction, account, or balance arising from a medical service, product, or device, except as specified. SB 1061, as it passed the Senate, required a hospital to maintain a database of all litigation resulting from money owed to the hospital by a patient or a patient’s guarantor, as specified.
The Assembly amendments, instead of a database as described above, require a hospital to maintain all records relating to money owed to the hospital by a patient or a patient’s guarantor, as specified, and require any contract entered into by a hospital related to the assignment or sale of medical debt to require the assignee or buyer and any subsequent assignee or buyer to maintain records related to litigation for 5 years. The Assembly amendments change the definition of “medical debt” to mean a debt owed by a consumer to a person whose primary business is providing medical services, products, or devices, or to the person’s agent or assignee, for the provision of medical services, products, or devices.
The Assembly amendments additionally require a health insurer to send notices, with specified information, to an insured and provider if the insurer sends payment directly to the insured and not to the provider for services provided, and authorize the insurer’s share of cost in possession of the insured that has not been paid to the provider to be reported to a credit reporting agency as medical debt if certain requirements are met. The Assembly amendments also make nonsubstantive double-jointing amendments.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—31.NOES—8.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.30S.B.No. 1064 —Laird.An act relating to cannabis.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1064, as it passed the Senate, revised the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) licensing scheme for commercial cannabis activities other than cultivation and laboratory testing. SB 1064, as it passed the Senate, consolidated the licensing of the activities described above under one license type called an operator license, and required an operator license to acquire an additional premises license specific to the activity conducted on the premises. SB 1064, as it passed the Senate, made various conforming changes including by revising and recasting the codified list of license types, as specified. SB 1064, as it passed the Senate, made its provisions effective on January 1, 2028.
The Assembly amendments instead revise the MAUCRSA licensing scheme for commercial cannabis activities by adding a combined license classification, as specified, and make various related conforming changes. The Assembly amendments additionally specify that an owner who is an applicant for a state license is not required to resubmit owner-related information previously submitted to the Department of Justice.
Vote: 27. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—35.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.31S.B.No. 1067 —Smallwood-Cuevas et al.An act relating to healing arts.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1067, as it passed the Senate, required specified healing arts boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs to develop a process, as prescribed, to expedite the licensure process by giving priority review status to the application of an applicant for a license who demonstrates that they intend to practice in a medically underserved area or serve a medically underserved population, as defined. SB 1067, as it passed the Senate, authorized an applicant for a license to demonstrate their intent to practice in a medically underserved area or serve a medically underserved population by providing proper documentation, including, but not limited to, a letter from an employer that includes prescribed information. SB 1067, as it passed the Senate, provided that compliance with the bill does not require the department or any of the boards to open a regulatory or rulemaking process to change their licensee application process.
The Assembly amendments revise eligibility for the expedited licensure process to require an applicant to demonstrate that they intend to practice in a medically underserved area or in a health professional shortage area, as reflected in a specified federal database, or serve a medically underserved population, as defined, and meet specified requirements for the expedited licensure process. The Assembly amendments require an applicant to demonstrate their intent to practice in a medically underserved area or in a health professional shortage area, or serve a medically underserved population, by providing a letter addressed to the applicable board from an employer that includes revised prescribed information, including a written statement from the employer, signed and dated by an authorized representative of the employer, on the employer letterhead, declaring that the information provided in the letter to the board is true and correct. The Assembly amendments provide that no criminal or civil penalty is to be imposed for a violation of that employer letter requirement. The Assembly amendments omit the statement on opening a regulatory or rulemaking process.
The Assembly amendments additionally subject the Podiatric Medical Board of California to the bill.
The Assembly amendments repeal these provisions on January 1, 2029.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—35.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.32S.B.No. 1130 —Bradford.An act relating to electricity.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1130, as it passed the Senate, required the Public Utilities Commission, by March 1, 2025, and each year thereafter, to require the state’s 3 largest electrical corporations to report on their efforts to enroll customers in the Family Electric Rate Assistance (FERA) program, and by June 1, 2025, and each year thereafter, to review each electrical corporation’s report to ensure it has sufficiently enrolled eligible households in the FERA program commensurate with the proportion of households the commission determines to be eligible within the electrical corporation’s service territory, as provided.
The Assembly amendments require the commission to review each electrical corporation’s report to ensure it has made reasonable efforts to enroll, rather than sufficiently enrolled, those eligible households, as provided. The Assembly amendments also expressly authorize electrical corporations to market enrollment for the FERA program separately from the California Alternate Rates for Energy program, a different low-income customer assistance program, and provide a separate FERA program-only application form.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—35.NOES—3.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.33S.B.No. 1177 —Bradford.An act relating to public utilities.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1177, as it passed the Senate, required the Public Utilities Commission to require certain electrical corporations, gas corporations, water corporations, wireless telecommunications service providers, electric service providers, telephone corporations, and community choice aggregators to annually submit a diversity, equity, and inclusion employment plan, as defined.
The Assembly amendments, among other things, instead require the above-described entities to annually submit to the commission a report describing (1) the employment of women, minority, disabled veteran, and LGBT (WMDVLGBT) individuals at all levels of employment within their organization and (2) the diversity, equity, and inclusion policies or activities that promote equitable recruitment and hiring. The Assembly amendments require the commission to add certain questions to the verification form described in the commission’s General Order 156, which governs the development of programs to increase the participation of WMDVLGBT business enterprises in certain procurement contracts. The Assembly amendments also authorize the commission to include an analysis of that information as part of an existing annual report from the commission to the Legislature, as provided.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—33.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.34S.B.No. 1184 —Eggman.An act relating to mental health.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1184, as it passed the Senate, required an order for treatment with antipsychotic medication for a person who is involuntarily detained for various periods of treatment time under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act because they are a person who is a danger to themselves or others, or who are gravely disabled, due to a mental disorder or chronic alcoholism or drug abuse to remain in effect at the beginning of the 14-day period, or the additional 30-day period after the 14-day period, or the second 30-day period, of the involuntary commitment provided that a petition for a new determination on the question of capacity to refuse treatment has been filed, and required the order to remain in effect until the court hears a petition for that detention period and issues a decision.
The Assembly amendments subject the above-described requirement to the presence of exigent circumstances, and require the hearing to determine a person’s capacity to refuse treatment to be held on an expedited basis as soon as reasonably practicable and within 24 hours. The Assembly amendments specify the factors required to be present in order for there to be exigent circumstances necessitating an expedited hearing, including, among others, that there has been a delay in a hearing to determine a person’s capacity to refuse treatment with antipsychotic medication, creating a risk that the existing capacity determination may expire before a new capacity determination is made, and the person’s treating physician executes a specified written attestation of exigent circumstances that is maintained in the person’s medical record. The Assembly amendments require that, each time one of those attestations is made and an order for treatment with antipsychotic medication remains in effect, the treating facility report specified information to the county behavioral health director in the county in which they operate, require the county behavioral health directors to provide that information to the department, and require the department to include that information in an annual report it is required to publish. The Assembly amendments make these provisions inoperative on January 1, 2030.
The Assembly amendments also authorize, except as specified, a person’s treating physician to request a hearing for a new determination of a person’s capacity to refuse treatment with antipsychotic medication at any time in the 48 hours prior to the end of the duration of the current detention period when it reasonably appears to the treating physician that it is necessary for the person to be detained for a subsequent detention period and their capacity has not been restored. The Assembly amendments authorize a capacity hearing to be conducted by remote means in an appropriate location at the facility where the person is receiving treatment, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.35S.B.No. 1249 —Roth et al.An act relating to older adults.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1249, as it passed the Senate, updated and revised the legislative findings and declarations related to the Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act’s requirement that the California Department of Aging designate area agencies on aging to work within a planning and service area to provide a broad array of social and nutritional services. SB 1249, as it passed the Senate, recognized the state’s major demographic shift toward an older, more diverse population and declared the Legislature’s intent to reform provisions of the act related to various functions of the area agencies on aging. SB 1249, as it passed the Senate, required, within specified time periods, the department to take various actions to reform the act, including giving counties the option to petition the department to be considered for designation as the area agency on aging that serves its local jurisdiction, develops core programs and services, and develops a statewide public awareness engagement strategy.
The Assembly amendments delete the requirement that the department give counties the option to petition the department and instead require the department to, among other things, identify older adult and family caregiver support programs and services and develop a statewide consumer engagement plan. The Assembly amendments require the department to develop regulations that address specific topics relating to area agency on aging designations. The Assembly amendments require those deliverables to be informed by data from validated sources. The Assembly amendments recast and revise other provisions of the act, including replacing the use of the word “senior” with the term “older adult.” The Assembly amendments repeal obsolete provisions of the act and the provisions establishing the Senior Housing Information and Support Center.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—32.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.36S.B.No. 1271 —Min et al.An act relating to public safety.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1271, as it passed the Senate, among other changes, defined certain terms, prohibited the distribution, sale, lease or offering for sale or lease of a storage battery, as defined, and required display of certain information on specified electric bicycles, powered mobility devices, and storage batteries. SB 1271, as it passed the Senate, prohibited the rental or offer for rental of a powered mobility device unless the battery for the powered mobility device has been tested, as specified. SB 1271, as it passed the Senate, clarified the definitions of electric bicycles, class 1 electric bicycles, and class 3 electric bicycles.
The Assembly amendments require the State Fire Marshal to adopt regulations that promote the fire and electrical safety of electric bicycles, powered mobility devices, and storage batteries, and make specified corresponding changes, add certain definitions, include charging systems, as defined, in specified requirements, and change the display requirements. The Assembly amendments require a powered mobility device, instead of the battery, to be tested. The Assembly amendments change the definitions of electric bicycles, class 1 electric bicycles, and class 3 electric bicycles.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.37S.B.No. 1318 —Wahab et al.An act relating to pupil health.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1318, as it passed the Senate, among other things, required the State Department of Education to, on or before July 1, 2026, update a specified model policy relating to pupil suicide to address crisis intervention protocols that local educational agencies would be required to follow in the event of a pupil suicide crisis. SB 1318, as it passed the Senate, required the governing board or body of a local educational agency to, on or after July 1, 2026, update their pupil suicide prevention policy to include crisis intervention protocols that align with the model policy, as provided.
The Assembly amendments revise the content required in the model policy and require the pupil suicide prevention policy of a local educational agency to include crisis intervention protocols that incorporate, rather than align with, best practices identified in the department’s model policy.
SB 1318, as it passed the Senate, required, at each meeting of the governing board or body of a local educational agency when the governing board or body reviews its policy on pupil suicide prevention, if the local educational agency does not have a school mental health professional, as defined, or contract with a mental health professional, as defined, the governing board or body to discuss whether funding should be identified for purposes of hiring a school mental health professional.
The Assembly amendments encourage, rather than require, the governing board or body of a local educational agency to consider whether funding should be identified for purposes of hiring a school mental health professional, as provided.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—32.NOES—7.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.38S.B.No. 347 —Newman.An act relating to land use.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 347, as it passed the Senate, required the Commission on Teacher Credentialing to award basic teaching credentials for teaching preschool in public schools.
The Assembly amendments delete the above provisions and, instead, exempt from the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act the leasing of, or the granting of an easement to, a parcel of land or any portion of the land in conjunction with a hydrogen fueling station or an electric vehicle charging station if the project is subject to discretionary action by an advisory agency or legislative body of a local agency.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 15In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 19Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.Aug. 26Set for hearing August 27.Aug. 27From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.)39S.B.No. 7 —Blakespear.An act relating to land use.Digest of Assembly Amendments Pending(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—32.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HOUSING pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.Aug. 27Set for hearing August 27.Aug. 27From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.)SENATE BILLS—THIRD READING FILE
ASSEMBLY BILLS—THIRD READING FILE
SPECIAL CONSENT CALENDAR #45
SPECIAL CONSENT CALENDAR #47
SPECIAL CONSENT CALENDAR #48
SB 1369, as it passed the Senate, required a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on and after January 1, 2025, that provides payment directly or through a contracted vendor to a dental provider to have a non-fee-based default method of payment, required a plan, insurer, or contracted vendor to obtain a signed authorization or electronic signature from a dental provider opting in to a fee-based payment method before the plan, insurer, or vendor provides a fee-based payment method to the provider, and authorized the dental provider to opt out of the fee-based payment method at any time by providing written or electronic authorization to the plan, insurer, or vendor.
The Assembly amendments delay these requirements until April 1, 2025, specifically require written authorization, as defined, and require a plan, insurer, or vendor that obtains written authorization to opt in or opt out of fee-based payment to apply the decision to include both the dental provider’s entire practice and all products or services covered pursuant to a contract with the dental provider.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 15In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.365S.B.No. 909 —Umberg et al.An act relating to physicians and surgeons, and making an appropriation therefor.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 909, as it passed the Assembly, removed the maximum limit for loan repayments provided to a Steven M. Thompson Physician Corps Loan Repayment Program participant who has completed 3 consecutive years of providing services as a physician in a medically underserved area.
The Senate amendments additionally remove the requirement for the Department of Health Care Access and Information to establish an advisory committee on the above-described program, update the definition of the practice setting in which a physician or surgeon may practice for purposes of the program, decrease the service obligation of the program to 2 years in a medically underserved area, and authorize the department to award funds to applicants from additional specialties using separate funds.
Vote: 27. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 20In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.366S.B.No. 708 —Jones.An act relating to vehicles.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 708, as it passed the Senate, required the Department of Parks and Recreation to issue a special permit to California residents to operate certain off-road motorcycles at sanctioned events, as defined. SB 708, as it passed the Senate, required this permit to be available for online purchase beginning January 1, 2025. SB 708, as it passed the Senate, required the department to establish a fee for this permit, and to deposit fees received for the permit in the Off-Highway Vehicle Trust Fund. SB 708, as it passed the Senate, required money in the fund to be available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, as provided.
The Assembly amendments extend the above-described date by one year, thereby requiring the permit to be available for online purchase beginning January 1, 2026. The Assembly amendments also delete the above-described provision requiring money in the fund to be available upon appropriation by the Legislature, and make nonsubstantive changes to a provision related to the fee.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 22In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.367S.B.No. 1333 —Eggman et al.An act relating to public health.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1333, as it passed the Senate, imposed requirements for state and local health department employees and contractors to annually sign confidentiality agreements prior to accessing confidential HIV-related public health records, and authorized the disclosure of public health records related to HIV or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, as specified, when necessary for the coordination of, linkage to, or reengagement in care for the subject of the record.
The Assembly amendments add legislative findings and declarations as to the benefits of HIV-related data sharing and legislative intent to enhance data sharing practices.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: no.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 22In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.368S.B.No. 1440 —Laird et al.An act relating to school operations.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1440, as it passed the Senate, required the State Water Resources Control Board, as part of an existing public reporting requirement, to also include a description of reasonable efforts undertaken by regional water quality control boards to identify dischargers of stormwater that have not obtained coverage under an appropriate stormwater permit and required the state board to also submit that report to the Legislature on or before December 31 of each year until December 31, 2029, as provided.
The Assembly amendments delete the contents of SB 1440 and, commencing with the 2025–26 school year, instead authorize the Stony Creek Joint Unified School District to operate one or more of its schools on a 4-day school week until July 1, 2029, in accordance with specified requirements applicable to all school districts authorized to operate on a 4-day school week and additional requirements that are applicable only to the Stony Creek Joint Unified School District, as specified. If the Stony Creek Joint Unified School District operates a 4-day school week pursuant to SB 1440 but subsequently experiences, in a single year, a decline in status in 50% or more of the state indicators used to measure performance that are included in the evaluation rubrics adopted by the State Board of Education, the Assembly amendments, commencing with the following school year, prohibit the school district from operating a 4-day school week. The Assembly amendments also add coauthors, update a cross reference relating to the applicable minimum instructional minute requirements for the school districts in the County of San Diego operating a 4-day school week, and include Legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Stony Creek Joint Unified School District.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 15In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 19Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on ED. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on ED.Aug. 26From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.)369S.B.No. 542 —Dahle et al.An act relating to taxation, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 542, as it passed the Senate, provided an exclusion from tax under the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020, and before January 1, 2028, for amounts received in settlement for costs and losses associated with the 2020 Zogg Fire in the Counties of Tehama and Shasta.
The Assembly amendments delete those provisions, and instead provide an exclusion from tax under the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2022, and before January 1, 2027, for amounts received in settlement for costs and losses associated with the 2021 Dixie Fire in the Counties of Butte, Plumas, Lassen, Shasta, and Tehama, or the 2022 Mill Fire in the County of Siskiyou.
Vote: 27. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.370S.B.No. 778 —Ochoa Bogh.An act relating to excavations.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 778, as it passed the Senate, modified the requirements imposed on excavators under the Dig Safe Act to provide entities that own, operate, and maintain subsurface installations, defined as operators, with advance warning of nearby excavations by notifying regional notification centers. SB 778, as it passed the Senate, gave an operator discretion not to locate and field mark an area to be excavated if the area delineated does not match the ticket and required the operator to contact the excavator to advise of the discrepancy and provide an electronic positive response. SB 778, as it passed the Senate, required an excavator to contact the regional notification center when requesting a return trip for various reasons and imposed requirements around return trips, as specified. SB 778, as it passed the Senate, required an operator to notify an excavator when an operator representative would be onsite to monitor excavation activity, as specified.
SB 778, as it passed the Senate, modified certain procedures an operator must follow before the legal excavation start date and time, as provided. SB 778, as it passed the Senate, gave an operator discretion on the procedure when the excavation is limited to removal of a portion of road or sidewalk, as specified.
SB 778, as it passed the Senate, placed restrictions around when an excavator may use a vacuum excavation device, as specified. SB 778, as it passed the Senate, outlined the protocol for an excavator to follow if they discover or cause damage to a subsurface installation, including when and how an excavator must notify an operator of the damage.
SB 778, as it passed the Senate, required the Dig Safe Board to compile and post publicly an annual report of incidents reported by operators and excavators through the California Regional Common Ground Alliance’s Virtual Private Damage Information Reporting Tool.
SB 778, as it passed the Senate, defined key terms as used in the Dig Safe Act, including “electronic positive response” and “legal excavation start date and time.”
The Assembly amendments limit an operator’s discretion not to locate and field mark to circumstances in which the area is not yet delineated and remove the requirement for the operator to contact the excavator to advise of the discrepancy and provide an electronic positive response. The Assembly amendments modify the requirements imposed upon an excavator whose ticket has expired, including that they must immediately cease excavation and may not resume until specified conditions are satisfied. The Assembly amendments eliminate the notification and other requirements imposed on an excavator when requesting a return trip, as well as those imposed on an operator when an operator representative would be onsite to monitor excavation activity. The Assembly amendments also modify an operator’s responsibilities to an excavator conducting a continual excavation, as provided.
The Assembly amendments eliminate an operator’s discretion when an excavation is limited to removal of a portion of road or sidewalk.
The Assembly amendments revise restrictions on an excavator’s use of a vacuum excavation device, including removing requirements pertaining to the vacuum equipment and vacuum equipment personnel. The Assembly amendments revise the protocol for an excavator who causes or discovers damage, including the threshold for when an excavator must call 911 or notify an operator or the regional notification center. The Assembly amendments impose specific timeframes for these notifications, as specified. The Assembly amendments clarify that these requirements do not preempt or impede the Dig Safe Board’s authority to impose more restrictive notification windows.
The Assembly amendments eliminate the requirement that the Dig Safe Board compile and publicly post an annual report. The Assembly amendments modify board member eligibility requirements, as specified. The Assembly amendments also update board duties to establish safety standards and to investigate reports of incidents to conform with other amendments.
The Assembly amendments revise the definitions of “electronic positive response” and “legal excavation time,” as used in the Dig Safe Act.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—40.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.371S.B.No. 896 —Dodd et al.An act relating to artificial intelligence.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 896, as it passed the Senate, required the Government Operations Agency, the Department of Technology, and the Office of Data and Innovation to produce a State of California Benefits and Risk of Generative Artificial Intelligence Report that includes certain items and required those entities to update the report, as prescribed. SB 896, as it passed the Senate, required those entities, as often as is deemed appropriate by the Director of Emergency Services, the California Cybersecurity Integration Center, and the State Threat Assessment Center, to perform a joint risk analysis of potential threats posed by the use of generative artificial intelligence to California’s critical energy infrastructure, including those that could lead to mass casualty events and environmental emergencies.
The Assembly amendments instead require the Department of Technology, under the guidance of the Government Operations Agency, the Office of Data and Innovation, and the Department of Human Resources, to update the report to the Governor, as required by Executive Order No. N-12-23, as prescribed. The Assembly amendments require the Office of Emergency Services to, as appropriate, perform a risk analysis of potential threats posed by the use of generative artificial intelligence to California’s critical infrastructure, including those that could lead to mass casualty events and require a high-level summary of the analysis be provided annually to the Legislature.
SB 896, as it passed the Senate, required a state agency or department that utilizes generative artificial intelligence to directly communicate with a person, either through an online interface or telephonically, to clearly and in a conspicuous manner identify to that person that the person’s interaction with the state agency or department is being communicated through artificial intelligence.
The Assembly amendments instead require a state agency or department that utilizes generative artificial intelligence to directly communicate with a person regarding government services and benefits to ensure those communications include both a disclaimer that indicates to the person that the communication was generated by generative artificial intelligence, as specified, and information, as specified, describing how the person may contact a human employee of the state agency or department.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.372S.B.No. 906 —Skinner et al.An act relating to collegiate athletics.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 906, as it passed the Senate, required, among other things, a postsecondary educational institution that provides material support or services to a student athlete in connection with the athlete’s receipt or potential receipt of compensation or items of value or services for the use of the athlete’s name, image, likeness, or athletic reputation to publicly disclose the total value of that material support or services provided to all of the postsecondary educational institution’s student athletes.
The Assembly amendments also require a postsecondary educational institution that shares revenues with student athletes to make publicly available the total value of the revenues shared with all of the postsecondary educational institution’s student athletes.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.373S.B.No. 908 —Cortese et al.An act relating to public health.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 908, as it passed the Senate, required the State Department of Public Health to utilize all of its relevant data regarding overdoses in the state to monitor and identify current trends of fentanyl-related deaths of children 0 to 5 years of age, inclusive, and to develop guidance and spread awareness of the trends to protect and prevent children from fentanyl exposure. As it passed the Senate, SB 908 required the department to annually distribute its findings and guidance, as specified, on or before June 1, 2025, and repealed these provisions on January 1, 2031.
The Assembly amendments instead require the department to distribute its findings and guidance on or before January 1, 2026, and repeals the provisions on January 1, 2029.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.374S.B.No. 931 —Dodd et al.An act relating to tribal gaming, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 931, as it passed the Senate, amended the Gambling Control Act to reduce the number of days within which a hearing on the suspension of a work permit must be held.
The Assembly amendments remove all the provisions of that bill and instead ratify several specified tribal-state gaming compacts and amendments to tribal-state gaming compacts with several specified tribal entities and declare the bill to be an urgency statute.
Vote: 27. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.375S.B.No. 946 —McGuire.An act relating to taxation, to take effect immediately, tax levy.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 946, as it passed the Senate, provided an exclusion from gross income for amounts received by a qualified taxpayer, as defined, as a California qualified wildfire loss mitigation payment, as defined.
The Assembly amendments make technical corrections to the parts of the bill that comply with Section 41 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and make nonsubstantive refinements to the definition of “qualified taxpayer” for purposes of the bill.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.376S.B.No. 963 —Ashby et al.An act relating to health facilities.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSenate Bill 963, as it passed the Senate, required all general acute care hospitals with an emergency department to adopt and implement policies and procedures to facilitate the self-identification of an emergency department patient as a victim of human trafficking or domestic violence to hospital personnel. SB 963, as it passed the Senate, required the policies and procedures to meet certain minimum requirements, including, among others, providing for patient confidentiality, facilitating a reasonably prompt and private interview of the patient by medical personnel, and refering patients to local services and resources for victims of human trafficking or domestic violence, if any.
The Assembly amendments instead require that patient confidentiality be provided in accordance with the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act. The Assembly amendments define “medical personnel” for purposes of the patient interview and specify that the interview is voluntary. The Assembly amendments also require that the policies and procedures provide patients with information to local services and resources for victims of human trafficking or domestic violence, if any.
SB 963, as it passed the Senate, limited the liability of a general acute care hospital acting in compliance with these provisions against damages for any subsequent injuries inflicted by a trafficker or abuser upon a patient who self-identified as a victim of human trafficking or domestic violence for good faith conduct taken under the policies and procedures established pursuant to these provisions, except as specified.
The Assembly amendments would instead limit the liability of a general acute care hospital, including its directors, officers, employees, medical staff, contracted health care providers, agents, and specified licensed persons, acting in compliance with provisions described above for any injuries or damages arising from, or related to, a patient who is offered or receives the information described above or who self-identifies, as specified, so long as the hospital has acted in good faith.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.377S.B.No. 972 —Min.An act relating to methane emissions.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 972, as it passed the Senate, required the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery to provide technical assistance to local jurisdictions regarding organic waste and methane reduction requirements. It also required the department to report to the Legislature on, among other things, organic waste and methane reduction, the status of the technical assistance provided to local jurisdictions, and the state’s ability to meet the targets for reducing the disposal of organic waste in landfills.
The Assembly amendments delete the reporting requirement.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.378S.B.No. 989 —Ashby et al.An act relating to domestic violence.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 989, as it passed the Senate, required the domestic violence response training provided to law enforcement to include specified indicators of domestic homicide in suspicious death cases and techniques for the identification and detection of staged crime scenes.
The Assembly amendments instead require those indicators and techniques to be incorporated into the guidelines for law enforcement response to domestic violence developed by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—36.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.379S.B.No. 1043 —Grove et al.An act relating to short-term residential therapeutic programs.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1043, as it passed the Senate, required, in case of an incident involving the use of seclusion or behavioral restraints in a short-term residential therapeutic program, the facility to provide a description of the incident, as specified, to the person subject to the seclusion or behavioral restrain and, as applicable, the person’s foster parent, guardian, or other authorized representative. SB 1043, as it passed the Senate, required the State Department of Social Services, by January 1, 2026, to create and post on its internet website a public dashboard that displays specified data collected on seclusion or behavioral restraints specific to short-term residential therapeutic programs.
The Assembly amendments require the facility to provide a description of the incident within 7 days and, by no later than the day following the incident, to notify any foster child subject to seclusion or behavioral restraints of their personal rights, as specified. The Assembly amendments require the facility to provide a description of the incident, as applicable, to the person’s parent, Indian custodian, attorney, if any, and the tribal representative for Indian children and require the State Department of Social Services to review all reported incidents involving the use of seclusion or behavioral restraints and to investigate any incidents that indicate a potential health and safety concern or licensing violation. If the State Department of Social Services determines that an incident should be investigated, the Assembly amendments require the State Department of Social Services to provide the Office of the State Foster Care Ombudsperson with a copy of the incident report. The Assembly amendments require additional data displayed on the department’s internet website, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.380S.B.No. 1091 —Menjivar.An act relating to school facilities.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1091, as it passed the Senate, limited, as applied to specified projects solely for the installation of a school ground greening project, as defined, on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus, the cost of complying with a California Building Standards Code requirement to provide a path of travel to specified areas of an alteration or addition to buildings or facilities that is accessible to persons with disabilities to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the school ground greening project.
The Assembly amendments, among other things, delete the provisions applicable to community college projects and instead limit, as applied to certain school district, county office of education, or charter school projects that improve community ecological health and climate resilience, or pupil well-being, learning, or pupil play, and incorporate nature, as provided, and that are approved by the Division of the State Architect on or before December 31, 2030, the cost of complying with that California Building Standards Code accessibility requirement to 20% of the adjusted construction cost of the project, as provided. The Assembly amendments also authorize the Division of the State Architect to adopt regulations to implement these provisions.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.381S.B.No. 1098 —Blakespear et al.An act relating to transportation.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1098, as it passed the Senate, required the Secretary of Transportation to submit a report to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2026, regarding the LOSSAN Rail Corridor that includes specified information and required a working group convened by the secretary to submit recommendations to the secretary for inclusion in the report on various topics relating to rail service in the LOSSAN Rail Corridor.
The Assembly amendments revise and recast these provisions by, among other things, making the requirement to submit the report contingent upon an appropriation by the Legislature for that purpose, changing the deadline for the report to no later than 2 years after an appropriation is made by the Legislature for purposes of the report, revising the required contents of the report, and requiring the working group to instead submit consensus recommendations and feedback on revised topics in a separate report to the Legislature on or before February 1, 2026.
SB 1098, as it passed the Senate, also required the secretary, in coordination with stakeholders responsible for operating rail services along the LOSSAN Rail Corridor, to submit a report to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2027, and biennially thereafter, on the performance of the LOSSAN Rail Corridor, as provided.
The Assembly amendments make the requirement to submit these reports contingent upon an appropriation by the Legislature for those purposes, delay the deadline for the first report to no later than 3 years after an appropriation is made by the Legislature for purposes of the report, and also revise the required contents of the report.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.382S.B.No. 1099 —Nguyen.An act relating to newborn screening.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1099, as it passed the Senate, required the State Department of Public Health, commencing July 1, 2026, and each July 1 thereafter, to report various data to the Legislature, including the identity of each entity performing a research project utilizing specimens from the California Biobank, the specific nature of the research they are performing, and the potentially substantial public health benefit from the research and a list of all publication citations where biospecimens from the California Biobank were used or referenced.
The Assembly amendments instead require the department to report data that includes, among other specified information, the number of published research studies where biospecimens from the California Biobank were used or referenced and the potential public health benefits from the research.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.383S.B.No. 1101 —Limón.An act relating to fire prevention.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1101, as it passed the Senate, provided an exception for a contract entered into by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection for the purpose of providing logistical support for large-scale prescribed fire operations, including, but not limited to, meals, lodging, hired equipment, and land use agreements, or any related subcontract, from specified state government contracting requirements.
The Assembly amendments additionally include onsite preparatory efforts as part of the contract providing logistical support for large-scale prescribed fire operations for which an exception from a specified state contracting requirement would apply.
SB 1101, as it passed the Senate, required the department to identify and map a comprehensive network of potential operational delineations that can be used for strategic wildfire response or the proactive use of prescribed fire using existing tools, including, but not limited to, the open-source tool known as Planscape.
The Assembly amendments remove the reference to the open-source tool known as Planscape.
The Assembly amendments also update Section 10340 of the Public Contract Code to include the latest amended form of that section as a result of the enactment of SB 164, which took effect immediately.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.384S.B.No. 1119 —Newman et al.An act relating to hospitals, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1119, as it passed the Senate, authorized the department to waive the seismic compliance deadline imposed by the Alfred E. Alquist Hospital Facilities Seismic Safety Act of 1983, to specified hospitals or medical centers, including, among others, Providence St. Jude Medical Center in the City of Fullerton, if certain requirements were met, including that the hospitals or medical centers report to the department, by specified dates, on its progress to timely complete the plan for compliance. SB 1119, as it passed the Senate, specified additional dates for the hospitals or medical centers to report to the department on its progress.
The Assembly amendments revise the list of hospitals or medical centers, add additional dates for the hospitals or medical centers to report to the department on its progress, authorize the department to grant no more time than is necessary for the hospitals to fully comply with the standards, and impose a fine of $5,000 per calendar day if the hospital fails to comply with specified requirements or demonstrate adequate progress.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.385S.B.No. 1138 —Newman.An act relating to pupil attendance.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1138, as it passed the Senate, required a pupil to be excused from school for participation in military entrance processing, as provided.
The Assembly amendments make nonsubstantive changes to address possible chaptering conflicts with AB 1884 and AB 2499.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: no.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.386S.B.No. 1146 —Wilk.An act relating to mortgages.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1146, as it passed the Senate, made various changes to laws regulating mortgages.
The Assembly amendments additionally include a forbearance, extension, or modification of a loan to an exemption from the usury limitation set forth in Section 1 of Article XV of the California Constitution for a loan or forbearance made or arranged by any person licensed as a real estate broker by the State of California, and secured on real property, as specified.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Jul. 1In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.Aug. 5Ordered to the Assembly.Aug. 5In Assembly. Held at Desk.Aug. 15Action rescinded whereby bill was read third time, passed, and ordered to Senate. Ordered to third reading.Aug. 19Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading.Aug. 26Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.387S.B.No. 1183 —Hurtado.An act relating to community colleges.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1183, as it passed the Senate, added living in a medically underserved area or population, as designated by the federal Health Resources and Services Administration, to the list of life experiences or special circumstances specified for consideration in a multicriteria screening process of a community college registered nursing program.
The Assembly amendments additionally explicitly reference the various languages of the African continent as languages that may be identified by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges as high-frequency languages for consideration in the portion of the multicriteria screening process related to proficiency or advanced level coursework in languages other than English.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.388S.B.No. 1207 —Dahle et al.An act relating to public contracts.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1207, as it passed the Senate, made changes to the definitional provisions of the Buy Clean California Act, including technical changes to the definition of “greenhouse gas emissions” included within those provisions of the act.
The Assembly amendments remove this definition of “greenhouse gas emissions” from the definitional provisions of the Buy Clean California Act.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.389S.B.No. 1225 —Jones.An act relating to real estate appraisers.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1225, as it passed the Senate, among other things, authorized the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers, upon petition by a licensee accompanied by a specified fee, to remove from the bureau’s internet website an item of discipline that has been posted on the bureau’s internet website for at least 10 years and for which the licensee provides evidence of rehabilitation, as specified.
The Assembly amendments limit this authority by prohibiting a licensee from petitioning to remove from the discipline posting a license revocation or a voluntary surrender that was the result of a pending investigation.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.390S.B.No. 1248 —Hurtado et al.An act relating to pupil health.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1248, as it passed the Senate, required the State Department of Education, on or before January 1, 2026, and in consultation with relevant stakeholders and experts, to establish and post on the department’s internet website, standardized guidelines specifying temperature thresholds or index ratings that trigger modifications to pupil physical activities during extreme weather conditions, as specified. SB 1248, as it passed the Senate, required school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools, on or before July 1, 2026, to develop, adopt, and implement a weather policy that includes protocols for extreme weather conditions, and required the weather policy protocols to incorporate the standardized guidelines developed by the department and to detail the specific measures to be taken during extreme weather conditions, as specified. SB 1248, as it passed the Senate, required the weather policy to be annually reviewed, evaluated, and updated, as specified. SB 1248, as it passed the Senate, commencing January 1, 2026, required the department, for these purposes, to, among other things, (1) identify any local educational agency that is not in compliance with the bill’s provisions and provide regularly assessed targeted technical assistance and resources to those identified local educational agencies for the development and implementation of their respective weather policy and (2) work collaboratively with noncompliant local educational agencies to identify specific challenges or barriers to compliance and develop customized action plans to address those issues. SB 1248, as it passed the Senate, defined “physical activity” for its purposes to include, but not be limited to, physical education classes, outdoor sports, athletic practices, and recreational activities conducted by a local educational agency.
The Assembly amendments require the department, still in consultation with those specified entities, to compile, instead of establish, those standardized guidelines, and require school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools to develop, adopt, and implement weather protocols instead of a weather policy, as similarly provided. The Assembly amendments still require the weather protocols to be annually reviewed and evaluated, but only require them to be updated if necessary, as specified. The Assembly amendments revise the department’s required activities for these purposes by instead requiring the department to simply provide technical assistance to local educational agencies in the implementation of their weather protocols. The Assembly amendments, among other things, revise the definition of “physical activity” for these purposes to instead mean physical education classes, sports, and athletic practices and games sponsored by a local educational agency, except for those relating to an interscholastic athletic program administered by the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF), and instead require interscholastic athletic programs administered by the CIF, including their associated practices and games, to comply with the guidelines established the CIF.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—37.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.391S.B.No. 1270 —Grove.An act relating to agriculture, and making an appropriation therefor.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1270, as it passed the Senate, among other things, authorized the Secretary of Food and Agriculture to adjust, subject to specified maximum amounts, the license fees for a licensing program for produce dealers and the license fees for a licensing program for processors of farm products if the secretary finds that the cost of administering the applicable licensing program must be adjusted for the sustainability of the program.
The Assembly amendments instead authorize the secretary to adjust those fees, subject to those specified maximum amounts, for the applicable program if the secretary finds that the funds needed to administer the applicable licensing program must be adjusted for the sustainability of the program.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.392S.B.No. 1288 —Becker et al.An act relating to public schools.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1288, as it passed the Senate, required the Superintendent of Public Instruction, in consultation with the State Board of Education, to convene a working group, composed of specified members, for specified purposes related to artificial intelligence in public schools. SB 1288, as it passed the Senate, required the working group to perform certain duties, including submitting a report to the Legislature, as provided.
The Assembly amendments, among other things, (1) delete the requirement that the Superintendent consult with the state board, (2) revises qualifications for certain members of the working group, (3) require at least one-half of the working group to be composed of current, credentialed public school teachers serving in elementary and secondary teaching positions with knowledge of the use of artificial intelligence in education, and (4) revise the purposes and duties of the working group.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—38.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.393S.B.No. 1317 —Wahab et al.An act relating to county jail inmates.Legislative Counsel’s Digest of Assembly AmendmentsSB 1317, as it passed the Senate, extended provisions regarding the administration of psychiatric medication without prior informed consent to January 1, 2030, and required any county that, between January 1, 2025, and July 1, 2028, administers involuntary medication to an inmate awaiting arraignment, trial, or sentencing, to prepare and submit a report to the Legislature, as specified.
The Assembly amendments additionally require any involuntary treatment to be consistent with the standard of care and would permit the county to demonstrate a documented attempt to locate available beds for an inmate in a community-based treatment facility by submitting a declaration under penalty of perjury.
Vote: 21. Substantial substantive change: yes.
(Final vote in the Senate:AYES—39.NOES—0.)2024Aug. 26In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.